|
Post by the light works on Mar 11, 2015 14:52:04 GMT
the vent thread came to the topic of people asking you questions while you are eating, and it brought to mind the stereotype of the waiter always waiting until your mouth is full to ask how your meal is.
so what are the actual odds of a table of diners NOT having at least ONE diner with food in their mouth at any given time? how could one test this to make watchable TV?
|
|
|
Post by kharnynb on Mar 11, 2015 19:34:14 GMT
depends on the country and restaurant i guess, in the USA i would say it could happen a lot in your "service"based system.
Over here, waiters only come if asked or the plates are empty.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Mar 11, 2015 21:02:55 GMT
depends on the country and restaurant i guess, in the USA i would say it could happen a lot in your "service"based system. Over here, waiters only come if asked or the plates are empty. ah, yes. in my region it is customary for the waiter to check within a few minutes after serving to be sure everything is satisfactory.
|
|
|
Post by OziRiS on Mar 12, 2015 0:23:19 GMT
depends on the country and restaurant i guess, in the USA i would say it could happen a lot in your "service"based system. Over here, waiters only come if asked or the plates are empty. ah, yes. in my region it is customary for the waiter to check within a few minutes after serving to be sure everything is satisfactory. And around here they hide out and will avoid all eye contact after your food has been served, just in case it isn't satisfactoy
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Mar 12, 2015 14:03:39 GMT
*Muses*
What about a more general myth; 'What are the odds?'
Maybe a number of myths about things that 'always happen' in day to day life, with an eye towards testing to see what the actual odds of such a thing occuring?
For example; (UK) You wait ages for a bus and three/several turn up at once.
The lights will always turn red as you get near them.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Mar 12, 2015 14:25:55 GMT
*Muses* What about a more general myth; 'What are the odds?' Maybe a number of myths about things that 'always happen' in day to day life, with an eye towards testing to see what the actual odds of such a thing occuring? For example; (UK) You wait ages for a bus and three/several turn up at once. The lights will always turn red as you get near them. hitting every light red is nowhere near as irritating as having to stop at every light even though it's green. (yes, I've had that on a bad traffic day - everybody in town seemed to be waiting for a particular shade of green) or the "critical fail sensor" on electronics that makes it fail when you have a critical need for it.
|
|
|
Post by ironhold on Mar 12, 2015 17:26:00 GMT
The lights will always turn red as you get near them. The traffic light at the intersection of Avenue D and South 1st Street here in town (Copperas Cove, Texas) has a quirk in which it will, under certain circumstances, do just that. I go through southbound through that intersection at least twice a week with my route, and I'd say that the odds are 75%. All four facings seem to have this problem to varying degrees, and so it's not just the one set of sensors. It's possible that this is somehow the result of it being so close to a set of tracks (the BNSF rail line cuts the town in half), but I've not encountered any such problems with the intersections at Avenue D / South Main and Avenue D / Wolfe Road (despite the latter being right at the railroad's right-of-way). Another quirk: the intersection of North 1st Street and Avenue B has rather mercurial pressure plates serving as the traffic sensors, with the plates not reading you unless you've put your vehicle on them just right. The intersection of Highway 190 and MLK also has quirky plates on the north and south facings, but I'm not sure if this is due to the plates being sensitive to certain weights or certain locations; my car for example has a hard time tripping the south plate unless I'm fully loaded, but my dad's truck will set it off unless the plate's been nopeed by cross-traffic. Perhaps spin-off myths involving pressure plates?
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Mar 12, 2015 18:30:52 GMT
The lights will always turn red as you get near them. The traffic light at the intersection of Avenue D and South 1st Street here in town (Copperas Cove, Texas) has a quirk in which it will, under certain circumstances, do just that. I go through southbound through that intersection at least twice a week with my route, and I'd say that the odds are 75%. All four facings seem to have this problem to varying degrees, and so it's not just the one set of sensors. It's possible that this is somehow the result of it being so close to a set of tracks (the BNSF rail line cuts the town in half), but I've not encountered any such problems with the intersections at Avenue D / South Main and Avenue D / Wolfe Road (despite the latter being right at the railroad's right-of-way). Another quirk: the intersection of North 1st Street and Avenue B has rather mercurial pressure plates serving as the traffic sensors, with the plates not reading you unless you've put your vehicle on them just right. The intersection of Highway 190 and MLK also has quirky plates on the north and south facings, but I'm not sure if this is due to the plates being sensitive to certain weights or certain locations; my car for example has a hard time tripping the south plate unless I'm fully loaded, but my dad's truck will set it off unless the plate's been nopeed by cross-traffic. Perhaps spin-off myths involving pressure plates? I have not seen an active pressure plate system in over 20 years in my area. I'm guessing they are more prone to becoming quirky than induction coils.
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Mar 13, 2015 7:55:24 GMT
As an Ex-Bus driver, I have the answer to that...
You know the particularly bad parts of town where even the police dogs go around in pairs?... Well its the same with buses, we travel in "packs" for safety sake.
Sharing the laugh I just had, due to a miss read, I had to read that twice, because to me the screen just said Perhaps spin-off myths involving pleasure plates? Dayum!, I think I need new glasses.....
Not quite as irritating as the time I heard on the radio an accident closing a road I was heading towards, and knowing I had to stop within half hour to take my legal driving break, so by the time I get there, the traffic is going to be unspeakable. Go Around?... I would, except none of the alternatives had bridges that would let me under, or over... IDW load that requires "That" route....
I phone in, the advice was park up and wait, do NOT set off until its completely clear, or you may end up running out of hours completely, if needs be we will send replacement driver. Mind-Flip, what the hell?... I was talking to an intelligent transport manager, and they are rare as rocking horse dung around these parts....
The thread is going ever so close to becoming a "Sods law" thread.
Sods law states if it can go wrong, it will, and if its going to do so, it will be spectacular, and why not NOW!.... "What on earth could possibly go wrong"
|
|
|
Post by OziRiS on Mar 13, 2015 11:53:30 GMT
Sods Law sounds like a spin-off of Murphy's Law
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Mar 13, 2015 12:39:43 GMT
Sods law is the full fat version of the "polite" Murphy's law.
Murphys law is the laugh at how annoying it can be... Sods law allows for the full blue steam and loud cursing with objects being thrown the full length of the room... No it doesnt improve anything, but you do feel a bit better...?.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Mar 13, 2015 14:41:36 GMT
Sods law is the full fat version of the "polite" Murphy's law. Murphys law is the laugh at how annoying it can be... Sods law allows for the full blue steam and loud cursing with objects being thrown the full length of the room... No it doesnt improve anything, but you do feel a bit better...?. we have a law of that nature. I forget now who authored it, but it simply says "Murphy was an optimist" we also have coles law which is finely shredded cabbage.
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Mar 14, 2015 7:02:08 GMT
There is also Jude Law who is a screen star
|
|
|
Post by OziRiS on Mar 14, 2015 19:34:01 GMT
And Ty Law who was one of the best cornerbacks the NFL has ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Mar 14, 2015 20:46:10 GMT
*Coughs*
Getting back on topic. Can anyone thing of any popular myth-conceptions about everyday life, as in 'this will always happen', not covered above?
We've got;
Waiting for a bus, only for several to turn up at once.
Lights always changing to red as you get near them.
Waiters always asking you about the food when you have your mouth full.
The second of these seems very easy to test - just drive around SF for a few hours and see how many lights you end up having to stop at (excluding any junctions where you are legally required to do so anyway). This strikes me as something that would be very quick to test and require nothing beyond a car. (They could also test this with a bike if they wanted to). If they pushed things they could do all the testing in a day, assuming they drive the same route at two different times of day to compare heavy traffic to light traffic. Even if they went for a slightly longer test it would still only be two or maybe three days at most with no real set up required, making this an ideal 'bottle' show if they are pressed for time or budget.
The bus test could also be viable, if they could work out a route and get volunteers to act as passengers. Work out a time table between two (or more) buses of, say, 5/10/15/30 minutes* and a short(ish) and long(ish) route that goes through SF**. Act as a normal bus, stopping to get passengers on (MB coins, good for one trip only) with two groups of volunteers per stop. The second group is simply told to get to the stop in time for the second bus. This would be more complex that the traffic light test, and probably have to be filmed over a couple of days to cover any factors that could lead to the second bus catching up to the first (such as the first bus being held up in traffic and ending up picking up passengers who'd been aiming to get the second one). But it would be viable, and I'd think have enough there to test in reasonable detail.
(*Off the top of my head 5/10 minutes is the shortest gap between buses on shuttle routes with 30 minutes being more average figure for most services during the day) (**It would probably be a good idea to take a look at existing bus routes in SF to see how long they actually are, and what the gap is between buses, to use as the control when planning the test)
|
|
|
Post by OziRiS on Mar 14, 2015 22:07:43 GMT
Well, there's also "it's always in the last place you look".
I know, the logic there is that you stop looking once you've found what you're looking for, effectively making the statement true.
But how often does it actually happen that the very last place you would think to look for something you're missing is the place it's really in? As in, there are only 10 different locations it could possibly be in and, more often than not, you end up going through the first 9 without success.
Is there some truth to it? Could it possibly be that the stress of having to find that thing RIGHT NOW is messing with your memory/intuition, making it more difficult for you to find what you're looking for?
I see the test for this going something like this:
Adam and Jamie get 50 tools and a cluttered room each and are told to scatter those tools randomly around the room. After a week or two, while they're doing a build and are pressed for time, a tool that they need for the job at hand is removed from their toolbox by someone from the crew and they have to go back into that room and find the corresponding tool that they'd put in there earlier. How many places do they each have to look before they find what they need and what do those results say about the original statement? Do they find it in 10 tries or less, or are they closer to 40 tries?
To test if stress is a factor, do the test again, but this time you remove something when they're not busy and tell them right away while they have plenty of time to find the corresponding tool in the room. Does that make a difference?
Of course, to make the test valid, they'd have to take out all 50 tools after each test and place them randomly again, so there's no chance of them memorizing where they've seen the 3/4" spanner the past 4 times they've been in the room and going straight towards it on their 5th test.
There's one tiny "but" about this method...
To obtain any kind of statistically relevant data on this, the test would have to be conducted several times, meaning that from start to finish, the test could span over a period of months. However, the actual time needed for each test might not be more than half an hour to an hour tops, so even if they did this once every few weeks for 6 months, the combined setup and shooting might not amount to more than 24-48 hours of actual work.
If they want to get it all over with quicker, they could use volounteers. Have 10 people come in all at once, give them 10 different things each to place randomly in the cluttered room, but don't tell them why they have to do it. Make sure they're all good to come back a week later and then have them go in one at a time to try and find one of the 10 things they each placed. Take note of where they look. Do they even go to any of the 10 places they placed their things in, or do they just randomly rummage through the room until they find what they're looking for? How many different places do they look before they find it? As a control, tell one or two to go look for something that wasn't on their original list of things they placed in the room and see if they even notice.
To test for stress as a factor, do one timed test and one where they're just told to find the item without any pressure.
Only problem I see with this approach is how do you count how many places each participant "looks"? If they just stand in the middle of the room and scan around, how many looks does that count for? They can take a quick glance and actually be looking in multiple places over a short period of time. Swap out the cluttered room for drawers perhaps...? Force them to actively open drawers to look, so they can't just scan the room? Maybe even only give them 10 tries each?
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Mar 15, 2015 9:55:40 GMT
Bus timings and experience. Getting late is a bad thing on a busy frequent service, like the every 10 mins routes and such. People dont turn up at the time they know a bus will be there, they just turn up knowing a bus will be along within 10 mins. So any kind of minor delay, you are not only picking up the passengers you would have, but the ones that turned up after you were supposed to have been long past that stop... Which of course takes time to load up. Meanwhile, the bus behind is not getting its usual load, is not delayed, and it busy catching you up.... This happened many times when I was a Driver, eventually the bus behind would overtake, and start getting it in the neck from people who think they will be the first to tell you they have been waiting more than 10 mins.... So as each bus now struggles with the extra load and the delay of each passenger taking their right to give you an earful, they are in turn delaying you even further, and eventually you BOTH end up running late, and the bus behind (Number 3) start catching you up as well.
"You are late, I want to make a complaint..." "Do you know whats making me late?.. every single person on this bus who has delayed me even further by holding up the queue getting on to tell me I am late..."
One passenger started shouting rude things at me before the bus had even stopped.... I let her explain to the queue behind her why I didnt even open the doors and drove away. I do not have to take abusive behavior on my bus, I dont get paid for that. We were also one of the first bus companies to use CCTV, so the video of her and the loud abusive language and threats stood as my witness.
Number 1 reason for delays on public transport is the passenger. "That one" You all know who it is, the one who opens the purse and digs right down to the bottom under a years worth of receipts, old bust tickets, lottery tickets and the like for the exact change. They know how much the fare will be, and they are frequent passengers, is it just me or are they doing this on purpose for some strange reason to annoy us all?.... It isnt that a simple thought of "get it ready before the bus gets here" is too hard to understand... everyone else is doing it?... They usually have a very heavy bag, on wheels, that they insist needs to go in the luggage rack, even if that rack is full, and despite being told a thousand times before that the driver is not allowed (By LAW) to leave his seat, will still ask that the driver lifts it in for them.... And then they do the "Dont set off until I have sat down" command performance, ....
And despite the fact they have maybe walked half a mile with that shopping, they will then make a fuss about moving someone from the front seats because they cant get to the ones behind?....
This isnt a day care center, this isnt a theater, this isnt a stage, this is PUBLIC TRANSPORT, sit the (beep) down already and stop annoying everyone....
People wonder why I dont use the Bus any more, its because by the time I had finished being a driver, I HATED all buses with vengeance.
... And just what is it with the people who wave at you from the other side of the road?.... I dont get this. At first I thought it was maybe a friendly frequent passenger waiving hello.... So, as you do, I waived back as I passed?... with a smile?... And suddenly they get all nasty like and annoyed at me?...
(This was for registered bus stop only routes, we didnt do the hail-and-ride service there, if you aint at the stop, we dont stop, we only take stop requests from people at marked bus stops for this service...)
And we NEVER stop for someone on the wrong side of the road.... We trialed the hail and ride service on one route. It lasted two months and was pulled after all the drivers, on mass, refused to operate hail and ride. Despite information posted absolutely everywhere.... People tried to hail us from behind a row of parked vehicles, where it was illegal to stop. People tried to hail us from definite no stopping zones, like the middle of a junction, double yellow lines, half-way round a roundabout (Traffic circle) withing the zig-zags of a pedestrian crossing, from ON a pedestrian crossing, and in fact just about every stupid place you can think of to stop a bus.
And then the every lamp post.... I stop to pick someone up, and I can see someone about 15 to 20 yds away looking directly at me, I know they want this bus... they expect me to move up 20 yds to pick them up?.. whats wrong with them walking down?...
Not stopping for someone on the wrong side of the road. We cant take the legal responsibility. We do not have the things you have in USA where school buses with their sign out prevent any other traffic from passing the bus... So the traffic does not stop. If someone from the other side of the road hailed a bus, and it stopped, they get tunnel vision and cross.... They dont bother to look first... And who gets blamed?.. US for stopping.
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Mar 15, 2015 10:02:14 GMT
Just one last trick, from a distance I see someone at a lights controlled pedestrian crossing. They time it just right to press the button so I had to stop.... The then calmly walk to the doors and try to open them using the emergency switch. (I had hit the isolator to prevent them opening..)
As I drove away, I heard the cursing.... it took about 5 mins before the radio crackled into life, HQ, "We have had a complaint you refused to pick up a passenger..." Video was my witness.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Mar 15, 2015 14:34:11 GMT
the catch to the red lights thing is it is credited with only happening when you are in a hurry. (or happening worse when you are in a hurry) it might relate that in some towns, the lights are synchronized by a timer, so if a person drives down the main street at the correct pace, they will hit every light at exactly the same point in their cycle. I think you can guess what will happen if they catch the first light red, and then it is off to the races as soon as the light turns green.
as far as things being in the last place you look, I frequently have that problem in my work truck. I will stumble across a thing that has been misplaced, and I will put it away in the correct place - then within a couple of days, I will need it and it will be playing hide-and-seek with me.
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Mar 16, 2015 8:29:46 GMT
"Traffic Calming", Maybe an urban myth, but, it is rumored that certain places will deliberately use traffic signals to slow traffic down.
Last place you look..... Ok, so how many people keep on looking after you found it?... Therefore its ALWAYS in the last place you look>?...
|
|