Post by the light works on Nov 8, 2015 16:50:35 GMT
for stuff that may contain spoilers, see the myth thread in the movie myths forum.
my immediate summary of San Andreas is "the backdraft of disaster films"
it is spectacular, immersive, and suspenseful, but as the technical advisor said, "I gave them a lot of advice, and they took a little bit of it"
I was doubly entertained between watching the adventure and picking out all the mythbuster fodder.
the basic premise of the movie is that the san andreas fault goes full on bonkers, and a LAFD rescue pilot goes on a solo mission to rescue his family. plot holes and technical errors abound, but it is still an entertaining, if only minimally believable, show. definitely not oscar bait, and while I forget the rating, I would not worry too much about teenagers watching it, possibly younger if minimally graphic imagery of people getting hurt doesn't distress them. when I think about it, I can't recall whether there was much in the way of language not acceptable at the citadel, and I don't recall any nudity at all.
my immediate summary of San Andreas is "the backdraft of disaster films"
it is spectacular, immersive, and suspenseful, but as the technical advisor said, "I gave them a lot of advice, and they took a little bit of it"
I was doubly entertained between watching the adventure and picking out all the mythbuster fodder.
the basic premise of the movie is that the san andreas fault goes full on bonkers, and a LAFD rescue pilot goes on a solo mission to rescue his family. plot holes and technical errors abound, but it is still an entertaining, if only minimally believable, show. definitely not oscar bait, and while I forget the rating, I would not worry too much about teenagers watching it, possibly younger if minimally graphic imagery of people getting hurt doesn't distress them. when I think about it, I can't recall whether there was much in the way of language not acceptable at the citadel, and I don't recall any nudity at all.
