Rorschach inkblot tests

I was asked to partake, I said "Looks like someone spilt ink..."
That was part of the RAF Medical.
I still cant make "Anything" of them other than spilt ink.

Or How about those who understand the question just dont want to "Play" this game?....

If I wanted to draw a picture, I would decide the subject matter before I started.

The idea that someone would half-start a picture and draw conclusions on how I think dependant on what I make from their picture is, and according to this new result, always has been, entirely dependent on their ability to "Fortune tell", as in, my interpretation has no wrong or right, but their "Professional" diagnosis of my state of mind depends on how THEY are feeling on the day.
As in two different days two similar interpretations of "I see a butterfly" may decide one day its a highly creative mind, the next, the person is having hallucinations.....

So I have always suspected something "Dodgy" about those tests, and for that reason, I have always declined to play that game.
Its not about getting the answer right, its about telling the psychiatrist what they want to hear.....

And I have always had the ability to tell people what they want to hear..... I can read people like that.
Its just being able to do that, I have more fun telling them the truth and seeing them struggle with it.
Especially when its not what they expect to hear.

So saying that, am I trolling the shrinks?...
No.
Not at all.
But I do discover how good they are when I am "Too sane to be psychoanalysed".....

So one is a lepidoctorist and the other runs a War museum.....