|
Post by freegan on Jul 15, 2014 22:00:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Jul 17, 2014 8:08:27 GMT
Good Plan..... And thanks for the warning.
Although I dont have a CNET account.... some on here may.
|
|
|
Post by freegan on Jul 21, 2014 16:02:18 GMT
Australian site hacked 3 years ago. NOW THEY TELL US. link
|
|
|
Post by freegan on Jul 24, 2014 12:19:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Jul 25, 2014 7:52:45 GMT
Caution. Beware Large Headlines. Like this one. News stories, if you google to find out more, just be bloody careful of which links you pick up?... A Cleaned up version of my claim will appear soon to all, but the news will break soon that some people are using news stories to hijack you away to Porn sites, Adverts, and other not so desirable sites.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Jul 25, 2014 14:33:29 GMT
Caution. Beware Large Headlines. Like this one.News stories, if you google to find out more, just be bloody careful of which links you pick up?... A Cleaned up version of my claim will appear soon to all, but the news will break soon that some people are using news stories to hijack you away to Porn sites, Adverts, and other not so desirable sites. this comes as little to no surprise. sad thing is these people feel they are entitled to hijack our attention and we have less recourse than a child dealing with the school bully.
|
|
|
Post by freegan on Aug 6, 2014 22:57:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by OziRiS on Sept 2, 2014 0:22:49 GMT
Thanks for the heads up freegan, but this one seems kind of phishy to me. 1.2 billion data entries from 420.000 sites and nobody's been out to warn their customers? It hasn't even been in the news? Seems a little weird... Especially the whole "working on a secure way of allowing people to check the dataset for their own passwords to see if they've been compromised"-bit. How exactly would that work? I see only two ways for me to sift through those 1.2 billion data entries to find out if something of mine was taken: 1: Spend a sickening amount of time going down the list manually, which would probably yield no results at all since I wouldn't be able to see the woods for the trees, or 2: assuming they'll put in a search function, type in each string of info that I'm worried this alleged hacker group may have gotten their hands on, meaning I'll have to type in my passwords, my credit card number or my bank account number in order to find out if they have them already. So I'll essentially be in a "secure" environment, controlled by someone I don't know and expected to blindly trust that they aren't trying to coax my info out of me themselves by telling me there's a threat and that they have the solution? Yeah, that's not happening! I'll gladly change my passwords - I do that on a regular basis anyway - but there's no way I'll be handing over my info to this company, just so they can do whatever they want with it and claim that I signed it over to them myself afterwards. It's potentially a good scam though, if that's what they're doing.
|
|
|
Post by ponytail61 on Sept 3, 2014 0:04:43 GMT
|
|