|
Post by silverdragon on Sept 6, 2015 11:27:54 GMT
How accurate is Polygraph, how damming are the results. Can they be faked (the results) to force an admission under duress.. "Polygraph says you lied, why?.." Or even showed "false" responses, or "Fail". urbanlegends.about.com/od/crime/a/fake_lie_detector.htmSomeone used a Colander to "Trick" someone into a polygraph test... Would the results and resulting information gained during interview be even legal?... But then again, how do you "Fail" a Polygraph?... If it showed you to be a bit emotional about something you were asked, how does it prove you lie or tell the truth, and how legal is an admission gained from that?. Random idea I have no idea where it is going, just is a discussion going to get anything remotely testable?... Basic premise, how definite are Polygraph anyway.
|
|
|
Post by OziRiS on Sept 7, 2015 6:45:44 GMT
Didn't the build team do this already? Granted, they weren't testing how reliable the polygraph is at finding the truth, but IIRC they tried different mythical ways of beating it.
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Sept 7, 2015 8:10:00 GMT
Hmmm... Yes, yes they did. Is this a "Redo" with a different scenario, as to what if even YOU dont agree with the results and you were telling the truth?...
|
|
|
Post by c64 on May 22, 2018 20:05:22 GMT
How accurate is Polygraph, how damming are the results. Can they be faked (the results) to force an admission under duress.. "Polygraph says you lied, why?.." A polygraph just measures various parameters electronically. Not more, not less. Those measurements are as accurate as you can measure stuff electronically. There are different sensors used to convert "body functions" to electrical signals the polygraph can measure. It can't measure "lies" at all. A lie causes stress inside the body since it is hard work to come up with a lie that is plausible. When you lie, you double check if the person you have lied to can know that you lie. This stress reaction can be monitored and interpreted. To determine what is a lie and what isn't is the task of a trained interpreter. For example when asked how old you are, you need to think about it quickly. Your age isn't fixed so there is no quick memorized answer you can say. Asking for your age is a key question in an investigation since it reveals how a lie would look like. Many questions answered honestly can cause data identical to what would be caused by a lie. For example if you are insulted by a question or the question makes you worry about something the polygraph will show signs of a possible lie. A machine "BEEEP - LIAR!" can't exist at all. A true polygraph interrogation is very complicated since the questions must be simple, harmless, may not be interpreted as implying something and repeated many, many times in different forms. A simple polygraph "lie" test must be done in multiple sittings and involves over a hundred questions to reveal a lie. And then there is no proof that someone had spoken the truth or not, just a chance expressed in a percentage.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on May 22, 2018 20:37:45 GMT
for that matter, a lot of "beat the polygraph" scenes in entertainment involve causing false positives instead of preventing it catching lies..
|
|