|
Post by the light works on May 31, 2013 15:53:45 GMT
and hopefully, the teams are not secretly browsing the site under assumed names.
a comment about the blueprint/voiceover guys throwing the teams off with impromptu graphics and voiceovers (not gonna happen because those happen after primary filming) led me to the idea of an April Fool special.
so if they were to do an April fool special - by which I mean, present the two teams with myths that seem to be plausible subject matter, and then collectively mess with the testing in subtle ways to make the results come out all wrong. proceed with the entire production and editing process out of view of the teams (even doing a phony show for review, although they will probably figure it out when the testing goes strange) then show it as an April 1 special with live comments from the teams interspersed throughout as they realize they've been set up.
under those conditions, what "myths" would we have them do, and how would we skew the results?
my first thought would be that we need a youtube viral video in the mix.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on May 31, 2013 16:02:19 GMT
The evident problems with this are;
Beyond Productions doesn't set the airdates of episodes, Discovery Channel does.
Adam and Jamie are Producers on the show, and as such it would be impossible to hide such a show from them. You also have to remember that it seems that the entire cast is closely involved in the selection of myths, which would make it very difficult to hide what was going on even from the build team.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on May 31, 2013 16:14:24 GMT
The evident problems with this are; Beyond Productions doesn't set the airdates of episodes, Discovery Channel does. Adam and Jamie are Producers on the show, and as such it would be impossible to hide such a show from them. You also have to remember that it seems that the entire cast is closely involved in the selection of myths, which would make it very difficult to hide what was going on even from the build team. true, those are significant obstacles, and it is pretty likely that the teams would catch on rather quickly. however, that doesn't make the concept any less interesting to speculate about.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on May 31, 2013 17:50:50 GMT
Oh, don't get me wrong I wasn't dismissing the idea just noting the problems such a thing would have. I had a similar idea with the saying 'you don't know what you have until its gone'. The idea would be for one team to steal small items from the other teams shop and see how long it took anyone to notice.
The major problem with the idea was of course hiding the myth from the team in question - which given Adam and Jamie's role of producers would eliminate them from the running.
|
|
|
Post by PK on May 31, 2013 18:05:52 GMT
I'd think for it to work it would have to be one team pranking the other.
It would also have to be set up as a joint myth, since they usually work seperately and a joint "myth" would give a plausible reason for the pranking teams presence.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on May 31, 2013 18:19:29 GMT
All they would need is the keys to the relevant shop, or at least someone on the 'inside' to let them in, and they could pull the pranks after the other team has gone home. This would work better than trying to pull any pranks in a workshop full of people, as there is a VERY good chance that someone is going to work out what is going on rather quickly that way. (Remember that we are not just talking about the cast, but everyone else who is working in the shop(s)).
My idea was to do this over some period of time, removing small and fairly unused things and then moving onto larger and more used/important items. (They'd need to replace the items before anyone starts talking about there being a thief in the shop - such accusations can wreck even the best groups very quickly. Might be best to 'borrow' an item for a single day and replace it that night - or just move items where they are unlikely to be discovered so they are not in fact missing from the shop at all.)
|
|
|
Post by PK on May 31, 2013 19:35:09 GMT
Maybe an "inside" man. Someone who can difuse the situation if need be; he can "find" the missing item before accusations get too heated.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on May 31, 2013 22:27:54 GMT
That would work once or twice, but after people are going to get suspicious if this inside man is always able to find the things that are missing or misplaced.
The other problem is that if this goes on for any length of time it would stop being viewed as funny and simply become annoying, especially if the team is working hard. Care would also have to be taken to ensure that people don't end up spending time looking for something rather than working.
Meaning that it would require some very careful planning to pull off without affecting whatever myth they are meant to be filming.
Personally I suspect that as much fun as this may sound to us, it would be judged as impractical and potentially disruptive and as such not be seriously considered for the show.
*And for any lurking Mythbusters*
Of course I could be in a position to have heard rumours about such a myth being on the list or planned and simply double-bluffing you. Not that I'm trying to make anyone paranoid or anything...its not like you've lost or misplaced anything recently is it...?
|
|
|
Post by ironhold on Jun 1, 2013 1:54:09 GMT
I think it'd be easier to just do a second bloopers & outtakes special.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Jun 1, 2013 2:31:56 GMT
have then recite an inventory and then "disappear" things that were not on the list. have a penalty box - and let the "thieves" disappear 5 items not on the list each night, and see how many go away before someone notices something missing.
|
|
|
Post by c64 on Jun 2, 2013 11:59:42 GMT
The evident problems with this are; Beyond Productions doesn't set the airdates of episodes, Discovery Channel does. Adam and Jamie are Producers on the show, and as such it would be impossible to hide such a show from them. You also have to remember that it seems that the entire cast is closely involved in the selection of myths, which would make it very difficult to hide what was going on even from the build team. Well, they had some challenges they didn't know about before they had got the task. The rest of the team might "code word" this as "challenge".
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Jun 14, 2013 7:41:14 GMT
Baghdad Battery.....
I aint sure if a series of piratical jokes would go down well with Adam or Jamie?....
And trust me I aint trying to p---(oor water)on anyone's bonfire here, I just wanna ask, is there room for jokers on the team?...
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Jun 14, 2013 14:39:27 GMT
I think so long as the jokes are not harmful, and in good taste, they will not be unappreciated.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Jun 16, 2013 13:30:27 GMT
The evident problems with this are; Beyond Productions doesn't set the airdates of episodes, Discovery Channel does. Adam and Jamie are Producers on the show, and as such it would be impossible to hide such a show from them. You also have to remember that it seems that the entire cast is closely involved in the selection of myths, which would make it very difficult to hide what was going on even from the build team. Well, they had some challenges they didn't know about before they had got the task. The rest of the team might "code word" this as "challenge". With Adam and Jamie all such shows were long before they became Executive Producers - so it was possible to keep them out of the planning process for individual myths. While this still holds for the build team, it has been noted in several interviews/comments that the cast have always been closely involved in the planning process. If you look closely at the 'unknown' myths they have done it seems that they were aware of what was being tested in a general way, just not the specifics. This makes sense if you think about it, since no one could force any of the cast to do anything they don't want to - or at least are unwilling to try for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by c64 on Jun 17, 2013 14:11:43 GMT
Even Executive Producers have their own "bosses" and you don't need any business relation to "candid camera victims" And they can always use a different show for the trick. It happens all the time that a great Discovery Channel show invites staff from other shows as guests.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Jun 17, 2013 14:45:10 GMT
Even Executive Producers have their own "bosses" and you don't need any business relation to "candid camera victims" The 'bosses' in question would be the executives at Discovery and Beyond Productions, but they don't concern themselves with the planning of specific episodes - although Discovery clearly asks MB to tie episodes into other shows (Storm Chasers) or network wide events (Shark Week). As I think Producer Dan made clear in his interview he works very closely with Adam and Jamie, and while he might technically 'outrank' them it seems that he is understandably hesitant to do so. As I've said, I'm not knocking the idea just pointing out that there are many, many practical problems to deal with - and for once these problems are mostly behind the scenes stuff. Even the best practical jokers know that you have to pick the right time and person. Pick the wrong person or the wrong time and all you do is stir up bad feeling, and that can wreck the closest groups in very short order.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Jun 17, 2013 15:01:01 GMT
Which is why I originally thought a viral video ought to be the subject matter - one team could do actual testing in advance, and then determine how to tamper with the tests to get the wrong results - using their special effects experience. there should definitely also be experts involved - who were all in on the joke. the goal would be to get the team in question to look at the results and have a "but that can't be right" reaction.
|
|
|
Post by c64 on Jun 17, 2013 19:40:52 GMT
The idea is not to make a fool out of them by force, the idea is to play an April Fools trick and let them decide if they want to put that onto their show or not - or get their agreement to be used on another show.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Jun 18, 2013 0:29:56 GMT
exactly - get something they can all laugh about.
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Jun 24, 2013 8:39:04 GMT
How about a "Bloopers" reel.... Stuff that went SOOOO wrong it wasnt put on TV?.... Or is this topic drift to a separate subject?...
|
|