Execution, Prison, Marriage, and other Trivial Moral Stuff :D

Contacted the department. No changes. And, more importantly, NO CHANGES IN THE WORKS EITHER!

Your pdf is nothing new. Standard warning. They've known these things from the start, AND HAVE MANAGED THE ISSUES INVOLVED WITH VARIOUS FORMS OF INDOOR FIRE WELL ENOUGH ON THEIR OWN WITHOUT THE NANNY STATE.

But, no.

We'll study (specifically) the gas stoves in "homes", (having proposed corrections to this supposed "problem" too) but leave out studying specifically Bunsen Burners.

Bunsen Burners, continuing with original commonsense warnings and guidelines get a pass, apparently.

Meanwhile, those nasty 'ol hick propane stoves and whatnot gotta be mo' scrutinized.

I see.

So, some guy out in the country, occasionally cooking a sausage or whatever has to have his cooking equipment studied, even though he likely opens a window if needed, when HE feels it's needed. He likely has only a few people indoors with him, such that building CO2 levels are alright. Because he's only doing this on the occasion that he needs to cook.

But, that situation sets off the "alarm bells" does it? Because, after all, we suddenly care SO much about hicks, but could give a rat's arse about students, apparently.

So, on some campus, they set up Bunsen Burners in a class that generally does class work (no fancy, extra ventilation installed), and burn several burners at the same time, while the room is crowded with people... and they do this, on this day, repeatedly, all day...

No alarm bells.

It's the hick's stove that has got to be "the problem".

Hmm.

Yes. I see.

Could it be we are setting up to try and force the hick onto a potentially more expensive electrical grid, (rather than his continuing on his own with propane, solar and whatnot), and that it is payback in some way, for an election that we hate?


Is that where this study ultimately takes us? Dealing mostly with "hicks"?


I personally doubt it was ever really conceived this way. My suggestion is just as goofy as anything suggested by social warriors in the past, however. Also,I do know several "country hicks" off the grid who will more than likely see it that they've been targeted, if things go poorly for them.

Guess we'll just have to wait and see.

(I suspect it will be about like we saw with marijuana studies ultimately being more about recreational use than any "solely medical use for special cases!" type of deal. In other words, the studies will end up doing MUCH more than originally suggested)

So, give the students a pass, even though it may be as equally dangerous for them.

In the meantime, start jacking with Hank Hill and his propane and propane accessories.

Got it.

.
.
.