|
Post by silverdragon on Oct 19, 2016 9:06:34 GMT
Does that explain Nope nope?..?. So its a paper ginger tom cat on his head?..
Laughing aside, thanks to Loki for the video, I am watching it now, and its all good stuff, and worth a longer watch later.
I have to question though, that "electrostatic forces"... is that not Gravity anyway?. As in, Gravity can be "heard" with the right equipment on the EMF bands of radio, therefore, they suspect its partly Electrostatic that is behind Gravity anyway?.. "All things attract", which is how someone weighed the earth a century ago by weighing a small mountain in Scotland by seeing how much it deflected a pendulum, and some basic maths... He was less than about 1% off by modern guestimates, not bad I say.
he fact it happens proves two things, 1 that it happens anyway, and 2, "Duh", its that easy, why didnt anyone else think of that?..
Sometimes the easiest answers are the hardest to get?.
|
|
|
Post by mrfatso on Oct 19, 2016 11:03:40 GMT
Does that explain Nope nope?..?. So its a paper ginger tom cat on his head?.. Laughing aside, thanks to Loki for the video, I am watching it now, and its all good stuff, and worth a longer watch later. I have to question though, that "electrostatic forces"... is that not Gravity anyway?. As in, Gravity can be "heard" with the right equipment on the EMF bands of radio, therefore, they suspect its partly Electrostatic that is behind Gravity anyway?.. "All things attract", which is how someone weighed the earth a century ago by weighing a small mountain in Scotland by seeing how much it deflected a pendulum, and some basic maths... He was less than about 1% off by modern guestimates, not bad I say. he fact it happens proves two things, 1 that it happens anyway, and 2, "Duh", its that easy, why didnt anyone else think of that?.. Sometimes the easiest answers are the hardest to get?. No gravity and electrostatics are not considered the same thing in Physics. There are 4 Fundamental Forces that are considered to act on objects in the Universe, Gravity, Electromagenetism, Strong Nuclear Force and Weak Nuclear Force. Electrostatics are part of Electromagnetic interactions and are therefore not to,do with Gravity. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interactionThe importance of the fact clumping was created by the electrostatic interactions was to show that particles would clump together and stay there even when the gravitation forces between them was considered too small for it to occur. Before it had been observed it had not been explained why small particles would accrete together to form the larger particles that would begin to come together due to their gravitation field.
|
|
|
Post by GTCGreg on Oct 19, 2016 12:38:45 GMT
First step is to prove it happens. Second step is to figure out why. so, two steps for the price of one. heck of a deal. Plastic bag - $.10 coffee grounds - $.15 ISS - priceless
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Oct 20, 2016 5:27:53 GMT
Does that explain Nope nope?..?. So its a paper ginger tom cat on his head?.. Laughing aside, thanks to Loki for the video, I am watching it now, and its all good stuff, and worth a longer watch later. I have to question though, that "electrostatic forces"... is that not Gravity anyway?. As in, Gravity can be "heard" with the right equipment on the EMF bands of radio, therefore, they suspect its partly Electrostatic that is behind Gravity anyway?.. "All things attract", which is how someone weighed the earth a century ago by weighing a small mountain in Scotland by seeing how much it deflected a pendulum, and some basic maths... He was less than about 1% off by modern guestimates, not bad I say. he fact it happens proves two things, 1 that it happens anyway, and 2, "Duh", its that easy, why didnt anyone else think of that?.. Sometimes the easiest answers are the hardest to get?. No gravity and electrostatics are not considered the same thing in Physics. There are 4 Fundamental Forces that are considered to act on objects in the Universe, Gravity, Electromagenetism, Strong Nuclear Force and Weak Nuclear Force. Electrostatics are part of Electromagnetic interactions and are therefore not to,do with Gravity. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interactionThe importance of the fact clumping was created by the electrostatic interactions was to show that particles would clump together and stay there even when the gravitation forces between them was considered too small for it to occur. Before it had been observed it had not been explained why small particles would accrete together to form the larger particles that would begin to come together due to their gravitation field. Down at the deeper end of things, swapping electrons, and attraction by electrostatic mechanism which could be another form of swapping electrons, swapping nuclear parts, and interaction of the parts that make up an atom, could be seen as all in the same field. The interaction between one particle and another is usually the art of swapping electrons, sharing electrons, or swapping the basic parts that make up the particle... Therefore, "same thing", as swapping parts requires proximity, thus attraction... I know its a theory that has a lot of discussion, but when your doing a delivery, the getting to and from the place of delivery is still part of the delivery?.. Therefore, the theory that the "Four forces" may be interdependent may hold some truth, if not a hell of a lot of truth. My Kid did "A" level in this, and we had some very interesting discussions.... just how intertwined are those four forces?.
|
|
|
Post by Lokifan on Oct 21, 2016 6:58:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Oct 21, 2016 13:59:53 GMT
it's the pluto aliens using a gravity generator to get even for their demotion.
|
|
|
Post by GTCGreg on Oct 21, 2016 14:33:04 GMT
it's the pluto aliens using a gravity generator to get even for their demotion. Don't mess with Pluto
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Oct 21, 2016 15:11:07 GMT
it's the pluto aliens using a gravity generator to get even for their demotion. Don't mess with Pluto they say revenge is a dish best served cold, and plutoans know a thing or two about cold.
|
|
|
Post by GTCGreg on Oct 21, 2016 15:59:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by WhutScreenName on Oct 21, 2016 16:51:24 GMT
This explains it... As for the age, I'm sure there is no possible way they made a mistake... I'm sure the testers are infallible.
|
|
|
Post by mrfatso on Oct 21, 2016 22:59:57 GMT
You just made my spit up my hamster sandwich, if it's from The Sun it must be true surely.
|
|
|
Post by WhutScreenName on Nov 4, 2016 16:18:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Nov 5, 2016 5:24:30 GMT
best not to get in its way.
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Nov 5, 2016 11:04:04 GMT
VIMEO, I had to open that in a sand-box to make it work, and it like trying to watch it on Dial-up. However, Fascinating.
There has been a very good show on Disco Science recently "How the universe works". I just got through the one on "Plank-time", the ideal of dividing one second up into units so small that you can watch it back in slow-mo to catch all the action, bit like watching a video of the big bang on a slow-mo camera that would make even the mythbusters one look very fast?..
They also raised the ideal of "Before time began", which made me stop and think. There is no such thing as "Before time began", there is only the matter of observation, and the fact "No one was around to observe" does not equate to the fact it cant have existed unless it was observed.
I propose that time is also relative, and therefore, if you cant observe, dont try to ignore it.
|
|
|
Post by Lokifan on Dec 9, 2016 2:17:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by WhutScreenName on Dec 9, 2016 2:52:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Lokifan on Dec 9, 2016 3:27:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Dec 9, 2016 11:08:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Dec 9, 2016 16:16:53 GMT
the next space probe will be modified to take selfies.
|
|
|
Post by Lokifan on Dec 29, 2016 4:46:49 GMT
|
|