|
Post by The Urban Mythbuster on Jul 28, 2013 16:41:02 GMT
I currently have a Federal Safety Switch running to a 8-Pole Square D Load Center. I'm a believer that nothing is as easy as it seems, but can I just pull down the switch to turn off the Load Center and swap the 8-Pole Load Center for a 12-Pole (or greater) Subpanel? The main goal of this is to be able to establish the garage and shed each as separate breakers on the panel. Right now, the garage is sharing multiple breakers and the shed has no power. I would probably be running 30A breakers for both (the garage has a powered door opener & the shed will be used for a 15-gallon air compressor). See attached photos for current set-up.
|
|
|
Post by The Urban Mythbuster on Jul 28, 2013 16:41:48 GMT
These photos wouldn't fit on the first post.
|
|
|
Post by silverdragon on Jul 29, 2013 9:25:08 GMT
Yes you CAN.
First, if you wish to change a Meter, you need to call your supplier..... You can not open a meter panel at all without telling your supplier, some of them are even sealed to prevent such.
After that....
If you are upgrading a panel, its best now to go all the way back to point of origin and do Wiring as well.
You need to check you have wiring from main panel that will carry the load you wish to use.... By the looks of it, you would need 10mm wire from main house panel into your garage/shed?.... I am suggesting a set of Tails from either main house board or even Meter to this separate board that works independent of house electrics. Ok, so that will do much more than you require, but, that looks like quite an OLD box, so I am suspecting the existing wiring may be in need of replacement either now or in the near future, so why not get it done now....
I would suggest isolation of the whole lot, disconnect fully from the mains ate the house main panel, then one single modern box with maybe an 8mm 60 amp breaker to the Shed as one of the breakers.... You wont need a full sub-panel for the shed, an 8mm circuit at 60 amp is about what is used these days for a shower circuit, and I have that arrangement on my own house board, one circuit at 60 amps and a power-shower, all off the main board....
I suggest going "Overboard" now with upgrades to wiring because you never know how much power you may need in the future, so why NOT spend a little more and "Future proof resist" your requirements now?...
Whilst you are replacing one lot of wiring, do the job ONCE, instead of wishing you had gone for the better stuff a couple of years down the line.
|
|
|
Post by GTCGreg on Jul 29, 2013 12:40:44 GMT
Wow, you've got a real mess going there. Looking at your pictures, are you sure that main disconnect switch even works? The wiring looks like the switch has been bypassed. In fact, I don't see a switch at all in that box. Just a handle on the outside that isn't connected to anything inside. Unless there is another breaker or fuses feeding the Square D panel, you have another problem. You have no main current limit device. It looks like your main wiring coming into the disconnect switch (or former disconnect switch) was rated at 60 amps. But with no main breaker in the Square D box, there is nothing to keep you from overloading this wiring. You need a main circuit breaker or fuses somewhere in that circuit. If you are going to replace the breaker panel, I'd just rip out the entire mess (including the antique 60A main disconnect) and redo everything. Put in a new box with a 60 amp main breaker. But if you just want to add a separate circuit for the garage or shed, Square D makes what they call a single space tandem breaker that is actually two breakers in one. It's the same size as a the single breakers you have now. Just pop out one of your old breakers and put in a new tandem and you have two new circuits. In fact, it looks like your box has two tandems in it already. They're just older style than the one's they make now. Just make sure you're not overloading that main wiring. Most home centers carry tandem breakers. They come in various amperage ratings but I would NOT suggest running 30 amp 120 volt circuits. Go with 20A max but make sure your wiring and receptacles can handle 20 amps. It has to be 12 gauge wire and 20 amp receptacles for 20 and at least 14 gauge for 15 amps. You need 10 gauge wire special 30 amp receptacles, that are not compatible with normal plugs, if your put in a 30 amp, 120 volt circuit.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Jul 29, 2013 13:50:49 GMT
This might be an occasion where calling in an expert might be a good idea, if only so they can take a second look at the wiring. Two things I have a rule against messing with are gas and electricity.
Another reason for bringing in an expert is that if you mess around with the electrical supply and (god forbid) have a problem your insurance company is likely to refuse to cover you - in fact they may well refuse to insure you against fire if the electrical system has been serviced or altered by anyone who is unqualified.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Jul 29, 2013 15:52:06 GMT
Greg made a very good catch. that switch has been gutted and the wires spliced through. that means your simplest fix is to shut down the breaker feeding THAT system (hopefully it is not directly off the meter) and replace the whole thing with a 20 circuit main lug panel. feed the panel through a 60 amp breaker as the main breaker, and as greg recommends, use 20 amp breakers for the general power circuits. do consider your local permit rules before committing to the upgrade - in some places in the US you can do your own work without a permit, in others you must pull a permit, and in others you must have an electrician's license.
better would be to pull a higher amperage feeder from your source and upgrade to an 80 amp system (which would use #4 copper feeders)
|
|
|
Post by Lokifan on Aug 1, 2013 6:11:36 GMT
All good advice here.
I'd recommend pulling it all and putting in a single new panel.
I replaced my old fusebox about twenty years ago with breakers, and have not regretted it. I had help from an experienced contractor, but managed to do it by just pulling a permit as an owner/builder.
It took about 12 hours or so once I had all the pieces. The only unexpected problem I remember was having to put an additional junction box inline with the main panel because some of the existing wires were cut too short to reach the new box, so they needed to be spliced.
Definitely consult your local permit folks. They were pretty helpful to me; their attitude was that the more they answered questions at the start, the smoother the final inspection would go. Plus, codes do vary considerably across jurisdictions.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Aug 1, 2013 11:18:02 GMT
I'd also check with your home insurer to make sure that whatever you decide to do will be accepted by them (and if/when they say yes make sure you get that in writing from them). The last thing you want is for them to refuse to pay out at some point in the future because the work done on the electrical system wasn't up to their standards.
You never know, they *might* even be able and willing to give you a list of people who can help you out and advise you better.
|
|
|
Post by The Urban Mythbuster on Aug 2, 2013 13:08:57 GMT
Thanks for all the great advice!
After reading all the comments, it definitely sounds like taking out the existing switch/panel & installing a new, larger capacity panel is the way to go. Also, finding an electrician to go over the system in person might be the best way to go. My biggest fear is that the switch is attached to the main feed because that will add a lot of time and money to the job (local electric company will charge for getting the power off & on at the pole).
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Aug 2, 2013 14:35:11 GMT
Thanks for all the great advice! After reading all the comments, it definitely sounds like taking out the existing switch/panel & installing a new, larger capacity panel is the way to go. Also, finding an electrician to go over the system in person might be the best way to go. My biggest fear is that the switch is attached to the main feed because that will add a lot of time and money to the job (local electric company will charge for getting the power off & on at the pole). Here, at least, there is no charge for pulling the meter, and that is all that should be necessary. actually, there is usually no charge for ANY electrician requested disconnect. It is only if they disconnect you for nonpayment that there is a reconnect charge.
|
|
|
Post by privatepaddy on Aug 2, 2013 14:57:03 GMT
Thanks for all the great advice! After reading all the comments, it definitely sounds like taking out the existing switch/panel & installing a new, larger capacity panel is the way to go. Also, finding an electrician to go over the system in person might be the best way to go. My biggest fear is that the switch is attached to the main feed because that will add a lot of time and money to the job (local electric company will charge for getting the power off & on at the pole). I am not about to give you contrary advice to the other posters, but if a safety/main switch has been bypassed, wiring looks a mess..... what is the rest of your house wiring like? what I see looks nothing like a tradesman with pride in his/her work would sign off on, more like the work of a cowboy. perhaps a safety audit is in order?
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Aug 2, 2013 14:58:26 GMT
It might depend on why you need to have the power shut off. If it is to deal with a potentially dangerous problem then they might not be allowed to charge you - worth looking into and another reason to bring in an expert to check the electrics.
If it does turn out that an electrician considers the wiring to be dangerous or not up to the local codes, it might be work checking to see if anyone from the electrical supplier has serviced or inspected the wiring in the last few years. If they did you may be able to convince the company that it is in their best interests not to charge you - meaning that at the very least they will avoid bad PR if not a law suite from everyone in the area they serve who had an electrical fire in the last decade.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Aug 2, 2013 15:17:38 GMT
Thanks for all the great advice! After reading all the comments, it definitely sounds like taking out the existing switch/panel & installing a new, larger capacity panel is the way to go. Also, finding an electrician to go over the system in person might be the best way to go. My biggest fear is that the switch is attached to the main feed because that will add a lot of time and money to the job (local electric company will charge for getting the power off & on at the pole). I am not about to give you contrary advice to the other posters, but if a safety/main switch has been bypassed, wiring looks a mess..... what is the rest of your house wiring like? what I see looks nothing like a tradesman with pride in his/her work would sign off on, more like the work of a cowboy. perhaps a safety audit is in order? I classify it as ugly, but most of it seems to be practices that were considered acceptable at the time they happened. I know many areas which have rules requiring things to be summarily updated after they have reached a certain age. in the US the general rule is they can only require a system which was in compliance when it was installed to be upgraded, is if it is deemed such a significant safety hazard that it needs to be remedied. one such example is the new requirement for Carbon Monoxide detection to be brought up to date. one issue is that the age of it looks to be such that I automatically recommend the owner consider a complete redo - which is expensive and invasive; and sometimes hard to justify because of it. in fact, I have only said "you need to rewire this house or it will burn down" once in 20 years.
|
|
|
Post by privatepaddy on Aug 2, 2013 15:29:26 GMT
I am not about to give you contrary advice to the other posters, but if a safety/main switch has been bypassed, wiring looks a mess..... what is the rest of your house wiring like? what I see looks nothing like a tradesman with pride in his/her work would sign off on, more like the work of a cowboy. perhaps a safety audit is in order? I classify it as ugly, but most of it seems to be practices that were considered acceptable at the time they happened. I know many areas which have rules requiring things to be summarily updated after they have reached a certain age. in the US the general rule is they can only require a system which was in compliance when it was installed to be upgraded, is if it is deemed such a significant safety hazard that it needs to be remedied. one such example is the new requirement for Carbon Monoxide detection to be brought up to date. one issue is that the age of it looks to be such that I automatically recommend the owner consider a complete redo - which is expensive and invasive; and sometimes hard to justify because of it. in fact, I have only said "you need to rewire this house or it will burn down" once in 20 years. Some one from a non electrical background asks for advice, I don't like giving advice. I've worked in the electrical industry since 1971, what you call "rough" I call something less polite. I am not saying he should get his house rewired, just to get a safety audit. Its your area of expertise, you are the local professional perhaps he should defer to your recommendations.
|
|
|
Post by The Urban Mythbuster on Aug 2, 2013 15:32:27 GMT
I am not about to give you contrary advice to the other posters, but if a safety/main switch has been bypassed, wiring looks a mess..... what is the rest of your house wiring like? what I see looks nothing like a tradesman with pride in his/her work would sign off on, more like the work of a cowboy. perhaps a safety audit is in order? My wife's father (deceased) was a licensed plumber and did a lot of handyman-type work on the side. My mother-in-law believes that this is something he did himself, which means the switch is over 30 years old (he passed in early 1981). The house was built in the early 1950's. Some of the electrical has been upgraded over the years due to remodels (1988, 2003) and a fire that gutted part of the house (1997). To say that the electrical is an hodge-podge would be an understatement.
|
|
|
Post by privatepaddy on Aug 2, 2013 15:41:42 GMT
I am not about to give you contrary advice to the other posters, but if a safety/main switch has been bypassed, wiring looks a mess..... what is the rest of your house wiring like? what I see looks nothing like a tradesman with pride in his/her work would sign off on, more like the work of a cowboy. perhaps a safety audit is in order? My wife's father (deceased) was a licensed plumber and did a lot of handyman-type work on the side. My mother-in-law believes that this is something he did himself, which means the switch is over 30 years old (he passed in early 1981). The house was built in the early 1950's. Some of the electrical has been upgraded over the years due to remodels (1988, 2003) and a fire that gutted part of the house (1997). To say that the electrical is an hodge-podge would be an understatement. My advice would be to get a safety audit, not saying that plumbers can't fix pipes, but I never heard of anyone drowning because a pipe burst. Hot joints, improper wiring joins have been known to cause house fires. Not that it is likely but I have known of wiring being done with speaker wire and no Earths.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Aug 2, 2013 15:44:04 GMT
I am not about to give you contrary advice to the other posters, but if a safety/main switch has been bypassed, wiring looks a mess..... what is the rest of your house wiring like? what I see looks nothing like a tradesman with pride in his/her work would sign off on, more like the work of a cowboy. perhaps a safety audit is in order? My wife's father (deceased) was a licensed plumber and did a lot of handyman-type work on the side. My mother-in-law believes that this is something he did himself, which means the switch is over 30 years old (he passed in early 1981). The house was built in the early 1950's. Some of the electrical has been upgraded over the years due to remodels (1988, 2003) and a fire that gutted part of the house (1997). To say that the electrical is an hodge-podge would be an understatement. Yeah, I'd agree that you need to get someone in to check all the wiring in the house in that case. Every time I've run across DIY work on potentially dangerous items/equipment it has always turned up to be dangerous. In the case of the old family car an uncle had serviced, the mechanic look one look at the wheels, turned white and couldn't speak for five minutes. Turned out that the wheels had been ready to fly off the car at any moment. I know that this isn't the reply you were hoping for, asking if you can upgrade one panel and ending up being strongly advised to get your entire house checked and possibly re-wired was not what you were expecting to say the least. Then again, this advice could well save your house if not your life.
|
|
|
Post by The Urban Mythbuster on Aug 2, 2013 15:54:52 GMT
I know that this isn't the reply you were hoping for, asking if you can upgrade one panel and ending up being strongly advised to get your entire house checked and possibly re-wired was not what you were expecting to say the least. Then again, this advice could well save your house if not your life. Actually, these are the types of answers I was looking for. To be able to hear from experts & others who have been through the process is enlightening. At the end of the day, it probably would be best to have an expert at least involved in preliminary stages of the project. So, at this point, I might put this on the back burner as we're considering a large addition to the house that will require upgrading the electrical (adding an entire second floor living area) in the next 3-5 years. I've survived running extension cords from the garage to the shed up to this point, I could definitely last a few more years.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Aug 2, 2013 16:13:29 GMT
It might be worth getting the electrics checked out now anyway, just to make sure there are no serious problems*. In fact this could be worth it in terms of adding an extension to the house, as you might be able to lay the groundwork for that should you need to have any work done. Getting the main system sorted out now, and if they know you intend to put in an extension, would/should at the very least save quite a bit of time and hassle once/if you have the extension built.
(*I'm not an electrician, but what everyone has been saying about your electrics worries me no end. Just because it has worked fine for 30 odd years doesn't mean it isn't dangerous or isn't a potential fire hazard.)
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Aug 2, 2013 16:14:51 GMT
I classify it as ugly, but most of it seems to be practices that were considered acceptable at the time they happened. I know many areas which have rules requiring things to be summarily updated after they have reached a certain age. in the US the general rule is they can only require a system which was in compliance when it was installed to be upgraded, is if it is deemed such a significant safety hazard that it needs to be remedied. one such example is the new requirement for Carbon Monoxide detection to be brought up to date. one issue is that the age of it looks to be such that I automatically recommend the owner consider a complete redo - which is expensive and invasive; and sometimes hard to justify because of it. in fact, I have only said "you need to rewire this house or it will burn down" once in 20 years. Some one from a non electrical background asks for advice, I don't like giving advice. I've worked in the electrical industry since 1971, what you call "rough" I call something less polite. I am not saying he should get his house rewired, just to get a safety audit. Its your area of expertise, you are the local professional perhaps he should defer to your recommendations. my common quote is "where do I stop?" if I had my druthers I would rewire anything too old to have ground wires, and strongly consider rewiring anything old enough to have undersized ground wires. however, I typically do not push for rewiring anything that still has viable insulation on the wires and the copper isn't failing due to abuse. my standard policy is also that any aluminum branch circuits up to 60 amps should be replaced with copper. (I am probably one of the few electricians that uses copper for service conductors without being forced to - though I don't do it all the time) but with that, a checkup is never out of order - assuming it is not following directly on the heels of a previous checkup; and any mess cleaned up is a win for everybody.
|
|