|
Post by the light works on Dec 3, 2019 17:14:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ironhold on Dec 5, 2019 17:05:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Dec 5, 2019 17:09:34 GMT
or maybe they are trying to capitalize on the new movie without paying premium prices for episode IX merchandise. it's not like Oriental trading sells first rate stuff.
|
|
|
Post by wvengineer on Dec 5, 2019 19:21:42 GMT
Likely trying to get rid of old stock to make room for new stuff. I got a bunch of Frozen toys in early November on sale for my kid's Christmas. They were making room for all the Frozen 2 toys coming in wit the movie coming out. Fortunately my Frozen obsessed Toddler doesn't know the difference as long as it has Elsa. So she's getting a lot of toys for cheap.
|
|
|
Post by ironhold on Dec 6, 2019 20:40:14 GMT
Latest round of rumors:
George Lucas himself took a stab at assembling a version of the film, and individual Lucasfilm employees may be on the verge of staging a mutiny if his version isn't chosen as the final release print.
|
|
|
Post by wvengineer on Dec 6, 2019 23:44:01 GMT
Lucas works best when as an ideas man and does best when he has limited involvement. The best SW are Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi, where he was only partially involved and they were mainly done by other people. The ones where he had the most control were the Prequels and are considered the worst of the series.
If they are letting Lucas had a crack at it, they are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Dec 7, 2019 1:41:14 GMT
The Rise of the Resistance ride has now opened, to good reviews...for those who've had a chance to ride it between breakdowns. Disney staff have been saying for a while that the ride was not ready for opening yet, but was being pushed ahead by desperate Execs in the hopes it would increase traffic to the parks. The result has been, well it broke down at the media event resulting in people having to be evacuated and has since been breaking down every other ride.
New rides of this complexity will be expected to have some issues after opening, so in and of itself its not that surprising to have some. Although the number and frequency of the breakdowns are, as I said, a result of Disney execs ignoring the people who are responsible for actually making and running the damn thing and opening it before it was really ready. What has left egg on Disney's face however is that not that long ago they threw some shade at Universal for them having some issues on one of their Harry Potter rides. Saying that you shouldn't have ten hour waits if you knew what they were doing. Guess how long wait times are at Disney now? Yeap, in some cases a lot longer - as in 'come back tomorrow'. Universal for their part have not, yet, returned the compliment.
In other news; The Last Jedi is being used to teach scriptwriting...as in how NOT to write a script.
|
|
|
Post by ironhold on Dec 7, 2019 2:26:23 GMT
In other news; The Last Jedi is being used to teach scriptwriting...as in how NOT to write a script. I can already hear the Kennedy supporters screaming, as this makes it official the film was a dud.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Dec 7, 2019 5:21:43 GMT
and I've been able to hear the kennedy critics for over a year, now.
|
|
|
Post by ironhold on Dec 7, 2019 6:13:45 GMT
and I've been able to hear the kennedy critics for over a year, now. The Last Jedi is "culture war" territory, with a person's liking or not liking the film being taken as as a signal for where one stands on a whole host of largely unrelated socio-political issues. As a consequence, anyone who was critical of TLJ for *any* reason, including questions about the fighting styles and military tactics, was branded as a "hater" and even a "bigot". This is official admission that the film had structural flaws that are legitimate topics for criticism.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Dec 7, 2019 6:50:00 GMT
and I've been able to hear the kennedy critics for over a year, now. The Last Jedi is "culture war" territory, with a person's liking or not liking the film being taken as as a signal for where one stands on a whole host of largely unrelated socio-political issues. As a consequence, anyone who was critical of TLJ for *any* reason, including questions about the fighting styles and military tactics, was branded as a "hater" and even a "bigot". This is official admission that the film had structural flaws that are legitimate topics for criticism. you mean like the ones who said Rey wasn't qualified to be a force user because the fight choreography left her open to one of snoke's guards?
|
|
|
Post by Cybermortis on Dec 7, 2019 15:38:55 GMT
The Last Jedi is "culture war" territory, with a person's liking or not liking the film being taken as as a signal for where one stands on a whole host of largely unrelated socio-political issues. As a consequence, anyone who was critical of TLJ for *any* reason, including questions about the fighting styles and military tactics, was branded as a "hater" and even a "bigot". This is official admission that the film had structural flaws that are legitimate topics for criticism. you mean like the ones who said Rey wasn't qualified to be a force user because the fight choreography left her open to one of snoke's guards? And where did they say this? Are these the same 'toxic' fans who drove Daisy Ridley and Kelly Marie Tran off social media? You know, the ones who were SO toxic they drove them off those platforms several weeks before their films actually screened? The issue about that fight scene was how the production was to lazy to come up with an actual choreographed fight scene, ended up with a moment where Ray should have been knifed in the back. Then just CGI'ed the second knife out of the shot because they figured the audience was too stupid and/or had too short an attention span to recall that the bad guys, a second earlier, had all been duel welding weapons. The entire fight sequence is filled with moments where the bad guys start an attack, pause for the actor to recall what they should be doing and react, then continue. Heck I think there is even one moment where one of the bad guys pauses mid swing to allow Ray to get into posision to avoid bisection. It is literally style over substance, or logic or having put in any actual work on the damn film. Compare to both the original trilogy and the prequels, where the actors tended to train for weeks to do the fight scenes themselves and those fights had a logical flow to them. Where the abilities of the actors was limited they found ways around this that didn't involve having to change the internal universe or treating the audience as being inattentive idiots. David Prouse didn't do the Vader fight scenes in Empire or, I think, Return of the Jedi as the helmet restricted vision. They felt it was safer there to use an actual swordsman. Christopher Lee didn't do most of the fight scenes in Revenge of the Sith, and I assume Attack of the Clones, because he was in his 80's and also had problems holding the sabre. Ian McDirmid also did his own fight scenes, even though he admitted to not having any skill, training or experience with sword fighting, in Revenge of the Sith. He is even praised by the production for doing so in the films commentary track; It probably also explains why the Palpatine fights were shorter and closer in shots compared to the Obi-Wan/Anakin fights which had longer cuts and wider frames. Yoda apparently did his own fight scenes.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Dec 7, 2019 16:38:25 GMT
you mean like the ones who said Rey wasn't qualified to be a force user because the fight choreography left her open to one of snoke's guards? And where did they say this? Are these the same 'toxic' fans who drove Daisy Ridley and Kelly Marie Tran off social media? You know, the ones who were SO toxic they drove them off those platforms several weeks before their films actually screened? The issue about that fight scene was how the production was to lazy to come up with an actual choreographed fight scene, ended up with a moment where Ray should have been knifed in the back. Then just CGI'ed the second knife out of the shot because they figured the audience was too stupid and/or had too short an attention span to recall that the bad guys, a second earlier, had all been duel welding weapons. The entire fight sequence is filled with moments where the bad guys start an attack, pause for the actor to recall what they should be doing and react, then continue. Heck I think there is even one moment where one of the bad guys pauses mid swing to allow Ray to get into posision to avoid bisection. It is literally style over substance, or logic or having put in any actual work on the damn film. Compare to both the original trilogy and the prequels, where the actors tended to train for weeks to do the fight scenes themselves and those fights had a logical flow to them. Where the abilities of the actors was limited they found ways around this that didn't involve having to change the internal universe or treating the audience as being inattentive idiots. David Prouse didn't do the Vader fight scenes in Empire or, I think, Return of the Jedi as the helmet restricted vision. They felt it was safer there to use an actual swordsman. Christopher Lee didn't do most of the fight scenes in Revenge of the Sith, and I assume Attack of the Clones, because he was in his 80's and also had problems holding the sabre. Ian McDirmid also did his own fight scenes, even though he admitted to not having any skill, training or experience with sword fighting, in Revenge of the Sith. He is even praised by the production for doing so in the films commentary track; It probably also explains why the Palpatine fights were shorter and closer in shots compared to the Obi-Wan/Anakin fights which had longer cuts and wider frames. Yoda apparently did his own fight scenes. page back. keep in mind the criticism of episode 9 has also already been going on for several weeks. and that's just in a forum where objectivity is promoted.
|
|
|
Post by ironhold on Dec 7, 2019 20:06:42 GMT
you mean like the ones who said Rey wasn't qualified to be a force user because the fight choreography left her open to one of snoke's guards? And where did they say this? Are these the same 'toxic' fans who drove Daisy Ridley and Kelly Marie Tran off social media? You know, the ones who were SO toxic they drove them off those platforms several weeks before their films actually screened? And oh by the way, there's evidence to suggest that at least with Kelly Marie Tran, what pushed her to leave social media was her misunderstanding a contractual obligation requiring utmost secrecy about a project; apparently, she may have believed that even having her accounts active was a liability at the time. Just look at most of your bigger American professional wrestling organizations, and even some of your better international organizations. If they can trust their talent to deliver a proper match, then only "you'll do this, this, and this" is needed. For example, Jesse Ventura wrote in his autobiography that before his very first match as a wrestler, his opponent, a veteran named Rick Atlas (IIRC), told him that Ventura was to wrestle his best match. If Atlas thought Ventura had what it took to be a star, he'd let Ventura throw him over the top rope (in that promotion, throwing someone over the top rope would disqualify the person doing the throwing). If not, Atlas would deliver two kicks to the head, and Ventura would take a dive. If, however, they can't quite trust their talent, or the fight is just that important, then they'll employ varying amounts of choreography, up to and including plotting it out start to finish like in the fight scene of an action film. So for TLJ to be so loose with the fight choreography in such a big-budget, high-profile number is alarming. It gives the impression that the people behind the scenes either didn't understand its importance or didn't care.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Dec 7, 2019 20:37:15 GMT
And where did they say this? Are these the same 'toxic' fans who drove Daisy Ridley and Kelly Marie Tran off social media? You know, the ones who were SO toxic they drove them off those platforms several weeks before their films actually screened? And oh by the way, there's evidence to suggest that at least with Kelly Marie Tran, what pushed her to leave social media was her misunderstanding a contractual obligation requiring utmost secrecy about a project; apparently, she may have believed that even having her accounts active was a liability at the time. Just look at most of your bigger American professional wrestling organizations, and even some of your better international organizations. If they can trust their talent to deliver a proper match, then only "you'll do this, this, and this" is needed. For example, Jesse Ventura wrote in his autobiography that before his very first match as a wrestler, his opponent, a veteran named Rick Atlas (IIRC), told him that Ventura was to wrestle his best match. If Atlas thought Ventura had what it took to be a star, he'd let Ventura throw him over the top rope (in that promotion, throwing someone over the top rope would disqualify the person doing the throwing). If not, Atlas would deliver two kicks to the head, and Ventura would take a dive. If, however, they can't quite trust their talent, or the fight is just that important, then they'll employ varying amounts of choreography, up to and including plotting it out start to finish like in the fight scene of an action film. So for TLJ to be so loose with the fight choreography in such a big-budget, high-profile number is alarming. It gives the impression that the people behind the scenes either didn't understand its importance or didn't care. and yet all I heard prior to now that that it showed Rey wasn't good enough.
|
|
|
Post by ironhold on Dec 7, 2019 21:05:16 GMT
and yet all I heard prior to now that that it showed Rey wasn't good enough. For me, it's *always* been about the poor choreography as far as that sequence goes. General consensus I've seen among everyone who knows how to fight with swords is that they went for "rule of cool" to such an extreme degree that there was no plausible way for Kylo and Rei to win that battle in real life.
|
|
|
Post by mrfatso on Dec 7, 2019 21:10:51 GMT
and yet all I heard prior to now that that it showed Rey wasn't good enough. For me, it's *always* been about the poor choreography as far as that sequence goes. General consensus I've seen among everyone who knows how to fight with swords is that they went for "rule of cool" to such an extreme degree that there was no plausible way for Kylo and Rei to win that battle in real life. Well except that Rei and Kylo are Force users with abilities that HEMA fighters don’t have access to. But it’s a blinking film, not a sword fighting documentary, movies from Zorro to the Three Musketeers have always gone for the Rule of Cool, and apart from a small, noisy section of the internet, most people are happy.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Dec 7, 2019 22:39:37 GMT
and yet all I heard prior to now that that it showed Rey wasn't good enough. For me, it's *always* been about the poor choreography as far as that sequence goes. General consensus I've seen among everyone who knows how to fight with swords is that they went for "rule of cool" to such an extreme degree that there was no plausible way for Kylo and Rei to win that battle in real life. well, considering the closest lightsaber battle in the entire star wars galaxy to real was the one between Darth Vader and Ben; I'd say "rule of cool" is completely consistent with the franchise.
|
|
|
Post by ironhold on Dec 9, 2019 15:13:02 GMT
NSFW due to language:
Someone who doesn't understand the history of the Star Wars franchise did an article simultaneously accusing all men of being sexist for not liking the new trilogy's female characters *and* accusing Daisy Ridley of ignoring her own "privilege".
As Kneon and Geeky point out, media pieces like this will do more to kill the next movie than any overt hatred. Simply put, as Ghostbusters 2016 revealed, people *will* "nope" right on out of media that's too controversial.
|
|
|
Post by the light works on Dec 9, 2019 16:00:49 GMT
NSFW due to language: Someone who doesn't understand the history of the Star Wars franchise did an article simultaneously accusing all men of being sexist for not liking the new trilogy's female characters *and* accusing Daisy Ridley of ignoring her own "privilege". As Kneon and Geeky point out, media pieces like this will do more to kill the next movie than any overt hatred. Simply put, as Ghostbusters 2016 revealed, people *will* "nope" right on out of media that's too controversial. I read the article: www.forbes.com/sites/lizelting/2019/12/06/women-are-saving-star-wars/#490a3e6649fdshe made it clear she does understand the history of the FRANCHISE. what she isn't a specialist in is the inner workings of fandoms. so she wrote the article from a business perspective. and it explains clearly why the media giants are choosing to ignore the demands of people who believe belonging to the fandom entitles them to artistic control in favor of expanding the franchise to appeal to the WHOLE market instead of just some vocal exclusivist niche. the article is NOT NSFW, by the way. addendum: nor does the article accuse all men of being sexist. addendum to the addendum: it also said nothing about Daisy Ridley ignoring privilege. and you will also note, the headline of the article is significantly different from what the internet famous "fanboys" say it is.
|
|